Studium, Ausbildung und Beruf
 StudiumHome   FAQFAQ   RegelnRegeln   SuchenSuchen    RegistrierenRegistrieren   LoginLogin

Bitte korrigieren
Neues Thema eröffnen   Neue Antwort erstellen
Foren-Übersicht -> Englisch-Forum -> Bitte korrigieren
 
Autor Nachricht
mensamedlem
Junior Member
Benutzer-Profile anzeigen
Junior Member


Anmeldungsdatum: 11.11.2008
Beiträge: 62

BeitragVerfasst am: 16 Jun 2009 - 17:12:17    Titel: Bitte korrigieren

Economists know that nothing can be done to prevent this kind of crisis. For capital, the crisis is the only way out of the crisis. It has to destroy the gigantic accumulated sums of capital to restore the rate of profit and re-start the accumulation process. The catastrophic process has already started. In the latest Global Financial Stability Report, the IMF estimates that capital of 4.1 trillion US dollars has been lost so far in the financial sector and losses are increasing. This sum, although being huge, represents an infinitesimal part of fictitious (and productive) capital that has to be destroyed, according to the laws of capital accumulation.

The capitalists themselves had to admit that the current crisis erupted in 2007 with the burst of the US subprime mortgage market bubble and the international credit crunch is not simply cyclical one or conjectural disturbance. It has been the worst crisis since the Wall Street Crash in 1929 and the Great Depression. It has historical dimensions in scope and depth; it affects globally the world economy, while its end is unseen in the horizon.

It is clear now that it does not affects only the financial sector but the entire capitalist economy dominated by a decades long over-expansion of finance capital invading, interconnecting and controlling all aspects of economic life globally.

Capitalist nationalizations, "the negation of capitalism within the capitalist system itself", are an extreme action to rescue capital from bankruptcy. Within the framework of the actual social regime, nationalization brings the charges of the crisis on the shoulders of the working people through the increase of the public debt, unemployment, inflation etc. On the other hand, it's an objective manifestation of the process of preparation and transition to the collective property of the producers under the control and management of the direct producers themselves.

The outright failure of so-called "neoliberalism" (neoconservatism in USA), the economic dogma followed by almost every capitalist government, was epitomized by the dramatic actions taken urgently by the champions of privatizations, of Reaganomics and Thatcherism in the US and UK, themselves.

The process of increasing state rescue operations started from the nationalization of Northern Rock in Britain in September 2007, of Bear Sterns, one of the "Big Four" investment banks in the United States, in March 2008, and then reached a decisive turning point that precipitated the September-October maelstrom: the nationalization of the twin giants Fanny Mae and Freddie Mac controlling the four fifths of the collapsing US mortgage market, in September 2008.
Zwanglos
Senior Member
Benutzer-Profile anzeigen
Senior Member


Anmeldungsdatum: 11.10.2006
Beiträge: 2912
Wohnort: Taipeh

BeitragVerfasst am: 17 Jun 2009 - 19:59:56    Titel: Re: Bitte korrigieren

mensamedlem hat folgendes geschrieben:
Economists know that nothing can be done to prevent this kind of crisis. For capital, the crisis is the only way out of the crisis. It has to destroy the gigantic accumulated sums of capital to restore the rate of profit and re-start the accumulation process. The catastrophic process has already started. In the latest Global Financial Stability Report, the IMF estimates that capital of 4.1 trillion US dollars has been lost so far in the financial sector and losses are increasing. This sum, although being huge, represents an infinitesimal part of fictitious (and productive) capital that has to be destroyed, according to the laws of capital accumulation.

The capitalists themselves had to admit that the current crisis, which erupted in 2007 with the burst of the US subprime mortgage market bubble and the international credit crunch, is not simply a cyclical one or a conjectural disturbance. It has been the worst crisis since the Wall Street Crash in 1929 and the Great Depression. It has historical dimensions in scope and depth; it affects globally the world economy, while its end is unseen in the horizon.


Da 'globally' 'involving the entire world' bedeutet, ist "affects globally the world economy" ein bisschen überflüßig.

Zitat:
It is clear now that it does not affects only the financial sector but also the entire capitalist economy dominated by a decades-long over-expansion of finance capital, which has been invading, interconnecting and controlling all aspects of economic life globally.

Capitalist nationalizations, "the negation of capitalism within the capitalist system itself", are an extreme action to rescue capital from bankruptcy. Within the framework of the actual social regime, nationalization brings the charges of the crisis on the shoulders of the working people through the increase of the public debt, unemployment, inflation etc. On the other hand, it's an objective manifestation of the process of preparation and transition to the collective property of the producers under the control and management of the direct producers themselves.

The outright failure of so-called "neoliberalism" (neoconservatism in the USA), the economic dogma followed by almost every capitalist government, was epitomized by the dramatic actions taken urgently by the champions of privatizations, of Reaganomics and Thatcherism in the US and UK.

The process of increasing state rescue operations started with the nationalization of Northern Rock in Britain in September 2007, of Bear Stearns, one of the "Big Four" investment banks in the United States, in March 2008, and then reached a decisive turning point that precipitated in the September-October maelstrom: the nationalization of the twin giants Fanny Mae and Freddie Mac controlling four fifths (kein "the") of the collapsing US mortgage market, in September 2008.


Zu den englischen Anführungzeichen:
Es gibt hier ein großes Unterschied zwischen AE und BE.

AE: Zitaten benutzen die "Doppelanführungszeichen." Wenn ein Zitat mitten in einem anderen Zitat vorkommt, werden dann die 'Einzelanführungszeichen' benutzt. Die Interpunktion wird innerhalb der Zeichen geschrieben.

BE: Zitaten benutzen die 'Einzelanführungszeichen'. Wenn ein Zitat mitten in einem anderen Zitat vorkommt, werden dann die "Doppelanführungszeichen" benutzt. Die Interpunktion (am Ende eines Satzes oder Nebensatzes) wird außerhalb der Zeichen geschrieben.

zB:

AE: "And then," Tom said, "he told me that he had 'an important meeting to attend,' which I thought was a lie."

BE: 'And then', Tom said, 'he told me that he had "an important meeting to attend", which I thought was a lie'.

In deinem Ausschnitt sah ich eine Zusammenmischung von den zwei. Du sollst dich also für die eine Interpunktionsweise oder die Andere entscheiden.
Beiträge der letzten Zeit anzeigen:   
Foren-Übersicht -> Englisch-Forum -> Bitte korrigieren
Neues Thema eröffnen   Neue Antwort erstellen Alle Zeiten sind GMT + 1 Stunde
Seite 1 von 1

 
Gehe zu:  
Du kannst keine Beiträge in dieses Forum schreiben.
Du kannst auf Beiträge in diesem Forum nicht antworten.
Du kannst deine Beiträge in diesem Forum nicht bearbeiten.
Du kannst deine Beiträge in diesem Forum nicht löschen.
Du kannst an Umfragen in diesem Forum nicht mitmachen.

Chat :: Nachrichten:: Lexikon :: Bücher :: Impressum